Compiling here our comments in a group discussion on WA. Apologies for any grammatical errors, typos & minor inaccuracies(but no wrong info per se) in history telling..they're there. Tried explaining an extremely huge topic in a few comments with my limited knowledge & recall. The essence & spirit must be understood.....
Notice the unending crowd and what the placards say...Chindus & HINOs would experience soon that Endia too will have its own Dungan jihad(China, 19th C). But this time around the jihadis might win if Hindus do not become like Hans.
Muslims are repeatedly testing us. Dry run. Recee. Warm up. Match Practice. Drill.
Let us explain a bit: Chirkut Hindus = Chindus, HINO = Hindu in name only. Most seculibs fall in the aforementioned categories.
We must know that in China the Hans killed 1.2Crores of Muslims over the 30 years of Dungan jihad to ultimately defeat them. Hans too suffered nearly equal casualties but were saved by superior number in population. Are Hindus, Chindus & HINOs ready for it..? China at the time was ruled by the great Manchus(who incidentally were not Hans themselves but were quite sinicised by then) who employed their own Hunnic/Mongol/Jurchen pragmatic ruthlessness and the Han Legalism/Statism to quell the Dungan jihad as well as the near simultaneous Taiping rebellion(equally grave to Dungan in magnitude and impact) coming out victorious in both. Sadly we lack all those attributes.
Our old friends and acquintances would recall that we've been warning of an abrahamic inflicted civil war not later than 2050 and by 2030-35 if successive regimes fail us. But the civil war is inevitable and will happen in our own lifetimes. Our children and grandchildren will've to fight the war. Are we preparing them? No. And don't expect any govt/kanstitusan, all dhimmi machinery/manual to save the heathen kuffar. With due respects even the military will not save us as it's a heavily secular colonial legacy which had been disempowered insidiously per design.China ever since ~250 BCE practices the fundamental philosophy of Statism/Legalism as employed first by their first universally accepted ethnic Chinese (Han) emperor Chin Shi Huangdi who received the philosophy from Lord Shang & Han Feixi both of whom were near contemporaries of our viShNugupta chANakya and probably developed the theory of statism/legalism independently. In this theory like chANakyanIti the state & its laws reign supreme not any individual,not even the emperor. The state could exist and function only if the laws are feared and complied with, the laws in turn must be devised only to strengthen & perpetuate the state. Chin Shi Huangdi thus burned Confucian books & killed the philosophers as they promoted needless spiritualism & softness. China always maintained since then the iron fist and velvet glove policy of the Chinese state having statism/legalism as the hard core and Confucianism & Buddhism as soft outer cloak. Communist party just doing the same. Now coming to ethnicities in China: it has thousands of them but since Chin Shi Huangdi all others have to be sinicised ie chinesified. Shi Huangdi was from the Chin dynasty. The name China comes from that. Their origins are from near the Han river basin/delta so they are called Hans too. Chin=Han=Chinese, a simplified equation.
Great Kublai Khan, the grandson of the great chakravartin Khan Chingiss (Changez/Genghis Khan) defeated the Hans in late 12th C and became its Huangdi,the heavenly/divine emperor but in his own lifetime he and the mongols(aka Yuan dynasty) became sinicised which happened because Statism/Legalism was deeply entrenched and the great Khan didn't find it necessary to remove it. Eventually they got completely chinesified losing their own strength and got defeated within couple of centuries by Han Chinese Ming dynasty.The Mings once again restored to full glory the Chinese empire as they saw fit. But in 16th C they were defeated by the great Manchus who came from south Siberia & Mongolia via Korea led by the great Commander Nurhaci who again established a non Chinese dynasty in China. They ruled till 1911 and under them the chinese empire grew to the maximum in entire history under direct rule of Beijing(then in Manchuria) and went on to include the southern Chinese Muslims of Yunnan and the western regions of uighuristan/turkestan what we know now as Xinjiang. The Muslims naturally revolted eventually and two major multifocal jihads happened: Dungan jihad was the major one. Simultaneously on Eastern coast the Xtians near Shanghai in Taiping region established their Kingdom of the heavenly prince(Jesus Christ). Both fronts led to wars lasting decades. Thus 1.2 Crores jihadis & 50 Lakhs of crusaders had to be killed by the Hans(ruled by sinicised ie hanified Manchus) who practiced Statism best when required the most. For the Manchus & Hans unfortunately the civil wars, despite their victories over the abrahamics on multiple fronts proved pyrrhic and they within a few decades succumbed to the white supremacist euro-american colonialist imperialism. Later on in 1911 the Manchus were overthrown by Xtian Chinese, with colonial help, led by protestant xtian Dr Sun Yat Sen which led to another civil war and in 1949 the Han statist Chinese supremacist in communist colours once again captured China.
We Hindus are facing genocidal abrahamics on multiple fronts like the 19th C China but do not have the advantages the Chinese had. Remember, the jihadis were to establish the Khilafa in China while the Crusaders had proclaimed Kingdom of Jesus in China with the respective ambition to ultimately take over the entire China even though they would have to fight amongst themselves eventually. Chinese jihad was aided by the Ottoman empire & other Momin powers of then and the Chinese crusaders were abetted by the Xtian Colonial powers; Britain was complicit with both the diabolique to considerable extent, especially in the latter. Now compare with today's Endia ie India ie truncated bhAratavarSha. After Pathankot there should've been nationwide search,siege & destroy manhunt but it didn't happen even after Maldah & Purnea. And regarding the Bengal CM's statement if this's not sedition, insurgency, & waging war against the state then nothing else is. She justifies the violent insurrection at the border town as "people's anger against the border guards of Indian republic and before that she brushed off the entire incident as not being any communal violence. Do we need to awaken our own elected government in the centre and implore it, beseech it to take any action against the anti-national forces..where are we headed to?? Our efforts have to continue..to awaken our dormant Hindu folks. The Chinese comparison is uncannily inevitable in our context.
With due respects we H are sutiyas compared to the sinic H who once realising the significance of a strong perpetual state never relinquished it and even made their conquerors adopt it as well as adapt to the perpetuity of the Han state. But see what happened to what Chanakya did..! Chandragupta Mourya himself bequeathed to his son the empire and became a renunciate muni!! This's the reason the vEda mention indra slaying the yati~s(hermit spiritualists) for they corrupt the human beings with dangerous softness & aloofness. Chandragupta Mourya could have been our own Chin Shi Huangdi immortalising chANakyanIti and the Astika bhAratIya state. No wonders the heathen kuffar Hans are now world superpower while we're looking into oblivion as heathen kuffar. In that context may we dare say to admire the n Koreans too as well as Iran. Like us they do not have any real civilizational friends in world whom they could rely upon and practice aggressive isolationist policies,highly unconventional yet admirable;many great countries including Japan once used it to great success. Though we obviously dislike any version of islam/communism but they know what is good for their existence and they're not wrong.
कोई टिप्पणी नहीं:
एक टिप्पणी भेजें