शुक्रवार, 1 जनवरी 2016

Did India really get independence from UK..?

Indian Independence:
Transfer of Power Source 6-

http://www.bl.uk/reshelp/findhelpregion/asia/india/indianindependence/transfer/transfer6/

This document from the archives of the British library, or at least what they made public,shows clearly that India did not exactly get independence from the UK. This was a transfer of power and only leaving the commonwealth means independence which we haven't done yet.

Also though the Brits feign aloofness their own records mention how they dictated the partition of undivided India and how the fundamentals of the Endian constitution were laid down, which obviously were the replica of the British Raj to rule the natives and exploit the "new" country.

Notable is the then Muslim population share in the various regions of bhArata and how Pakistan(both East & West) was made by acceding to the jihadis, thus carving up akhaNDa bhAratavarSha into at least three pieces, despite showing up the pretence of ambivalent concern and the mlechChas don't even camouflage their bias towards their Abrahamic cousins.

All Hindus ought to be acquainted with this historical fact. What exactly transpired between the Brits and ConG's Gandhi Nehru et al and what were the terms & conditions of the instrument of transfer could not be found by yours truly.

कोई टिप्पणी नहीं:

एक टिप्पणी भेजें