This paradox of independent thinkers professing gandhism and being called gandhian. And yes, on the ground its pinnacle is an RSS man becoming the country's PM. But I did not understand where some say this wouldn't have been possible without Gandhism. Or probably they imply that non-confrontational and escapist policies of Sangh suited Indian Democratic polity well and eventually one day the perseverance paid off as the mlechCha party declined on itself letting Hindu-Gandhian party win some day. In the long run but we lost our thinking and fighting capacities thanks to Gandhianism and let our country be ripe for balkanisation, & worse than 1947 in less than 70 years.
But why there's was no retaliation against the Nehruvian govt committing wanton atrocities upon the nationalist Hindus post Gandhi-assassination..? It can be argued that the Congress administration was only the British one but in name and thus was ruthlessly employed against Hindu nationalists in the aftermath of 1948 or that the people were not against the Indian government,even blindly followed it, while it went all out against Hindutva forces in the name of upholding the law(mlechCha one) which lay Hindus neither cared about nor protested much.
कोई टिप्पणी नहीं:
एक टिप्पणी भेजें