How the ambiguous, paradoxical, unrealistic & ideologically self-contradictory dhamma of tathAgata damaged dharma & bhAratavarsha

Its almost never discussed on public fora so as to how nAstika sampradAyas,particularly Buddhism destroyed the very foundations of bhAratavarsha which paved the path for islam to take over us with much less resistance,in fact its almost never disclosed that not just local kings but by and large buddhist people of what is now Afghanistan & Pakistan surrendered to and/or succumbed to islamic invasion without even a fight or even colluded with & helped the islamic invaders against their own blood and dharma brethren. One very big fault lying with the dhamma of Buddha is moral ambiguity. The best example is where non-violence is a basic tenet of buddhism but almost all buddhist communities including their monks & priests all over the world eat animals with gusto! And how do they slaughter animals? No. They do not. Traditionally in most buddhist societies,including the world famous Tibet, usually a muslim butcher is employed to do this violent abomination. The legend is that one day Ananda, tathAgata Buddha's favourite disciple,returned to sangha with bhiksha which was contaminated with a chunk of meat which fell into the begging bowl from a flying bird above. Ananda asked gautama Buddha about the dilemma whether to eat the food leaving the meat out or to throw the entire contents away. Buddha told Ananda to not throw anything and to eat the food with the meat itself as it will honour both the bhiksha as well as the karma. Buddha himself used to have meat,in fact the last meal he had before his nirvANa was pork-stew with rice after which he suffered unmanageable diarrhoea. The second big faultline was that the dhamma of Buddha was sponsored,practiced and promoted by the ruling class and elites who found it as an easy way out of the morals,ethics & scrupules of rigorous sanAtana dharma to be practised,thus taking resort to a nAstika dhamma. But the biggest fallacy of dhamma of Buddha was that he always chose to remain silent over the existence of God. He denounced the Vedas but neither rejected God like the jainas,lokAyatas etc nor he accepted God like the mImAnsakas. He either knew the answer but considered it irrelevant or he probably chose not to speculate. But the laypersons want answers,both Yes or No have been acceptable which they never got. Yet bedazzled by tathAgata's aura and competitive,though ambiguous,philosophy of dhamma-sangha people flocked to the new wonder as an answer to their dukha. Surprisingly yet, buddhism itself practices extremist pacifism! The buddhists in upaganasthAna and sindhudesh were so deluded that they thought that the islamic invaders suffered dukha and will find peace in dhamma-sangha with Buddha's philosophy;and that there was no need of any fight as it was violent which will cause bloodshed! Now this very dichotomy and ambiguity along with similar ones became the universal undercurrent of this path permanently instilled a moral weakness in its fabric which led to not just its own demise but insidiously,even aggressively,contributed to the destruction of dharma & rAshtra. Thus the inherent contradictions,paradoxes and ambiguities of the dhamma & sangha of Buddha led to not just its decay and destruction of one of the most influential religious philosophies in world in its own birthplace but also caused serious & permanent damage forever to its parent faith and geography as it was woven out of the same fabric,rather carved out of the flesh and blood of its precursors ie sanAtana dharma and bhAratavarsha. And a road which is built upon hollow grounds of escapism & eulogism will not just cave in sooner or later but also take the travellers upon to sure death with it.