शुक्रवार, 12 जून 2020

Whether Drs should earn?

It's totally ethical. Running a clinic, hospital is commercial per law, bijli pani property all charges are to be paid per commercial rates, then salaries of employees is there. In any Govt or Pvt hospital there're half to one dozen employees (प्रत्यक्ष + अप्रत्यक्ष) attending to a patient per day from sweeper to HoD. Then there're costs of sterlisation, airconditioning, laundry, medical gases, electricity back up, transport... endless list plus exigencies. That's why I always recommend people to NOT go to Pvt hospital if they cannot afford or doubt their charges. 
Simple OT gown comes for ₹1000-1500. What to talk of a PPE kit costing ₹350!  No quality check, most are not DGCI or Indian Pharmacopoeia approved. PPE kit must be impermeable to the tiniest of pathogen and it must be certified with criminal liability. Nothing's there in India right now. 

Some say 80% of Drs are unethical.  Because 80% population have negative ethics, Drs or any other professional are a cross section of this society only. 
It's a truth. Casting baseless  aspersions on the most noble profession is a reflection of one's thought process. 

Dr is NOT Bhagavan. 

Consumer Protection Act, Medical Establishment Act, Commercial Establishment Act and many other laws and judicial orders plus executive decisions explicitly say that medicine is NOT philanthropy but a fully commercial activity. Drs only protested it, everybody else sided with the system in this. Now after making medicine a market the Drs are conveniently blamed for the mess created by unethical people. If anybody in any business is criminally liable for astronomical monetary compensation and possible jail without expert opinion for every professional work it's natural he/she would safeguard oneself with money. Especially when medicine is legally considered commercial activity. 
Those who see Pvt Drs as villains must  consult Govt Hospitals only I always recommend. 

There was one old relative in a small town near a state capital who suddenly suffered AMI while in the capital, we were called up at midnight about suggestions, we told her to take her father right away to KGMU or SGPGI  whichever was close by after hiring an ambulance, she said OK, after a while she called again what to do, we said take him to Govt hospital urgent it's already late, she called us after a while and told us she admitted her father in a Pvt hospital as Govt Hospitals not good, we said a medical college is the best place for treatment and expenses are negligible but in Pvt everything with every visit will be billed so after he stabilises you take him to Govt hospital but she didn't pay heed to it and continued while complaining to us everyday that it's costly, we said we warned you to which she said she loves her father and did the best, we said then you must accept your own decision, in the end she was complaining that her lakhs were spent, mean the while we called up every treating Dr in that Hospital everyday to monitor his health and the Drs exempted professional fees for many visits, still she was unhappy saying the Drs loot the patients after her father was saved from death. 

Because the actual cost is always far more than what Govt empanelment schemes compensate to the hospitals. People want state of the art treatment done by most qualified Drs and the State of Art imported machines with branded drugs plus full personal care from latrine to medicine as well as 2 🌟 to 7 🌟 facilities  but want to not pay at all for their lives saved by all of the above, especially the Drs. All such thankless, selfish, ungrateful, rapacious, opportunistic unethical people are actually राक्षस।Most hospitals have not even received for years the dues amounting to even crores per hospital  under empanelment schemes from the authorities. 

Many a times it's being clearly pointed out that the dispensation has made medicine a business, not the Drs, in fact Drs always opposed the legal commercialisation of medicine. Can't blame Drs for the legal commercialisation of medicine by the system itself run by neta, babu, karporet, every one who matters in power. 
Insurance industry in medicine is the SINGLE BIGGEST PROBLEM making healthcare commercialised exponentially. It's the insurance industry which in cahoots with big corporate hospitals and pharma companies run the businesses in the name of healthcare and coerce the small fishes ie individual Pvt Drs to comply else be phased out of competition. Insurance companies have now entered Govt healthcare after gobbling up the corporate/Pvt health sectors. For these megacorps any patient or Dr is a client who help generate flow of money, Drs are not even experts of service providers but mere business generating units which must be ruthlessly replaced or eliminated if not profitable. In any karporet haaspeetal a medical bill has hardly 5-10% as Dr's fee, still the Drs get the blame and not the profiteering non medico owners of carpowrates doing all this in collusion with Pharma, Insurance,  hospitality & many other  industries. Laws for which are all made by Netas Babus. Govt hospitals are unable to get licences and permits for various departments and equipments despite multiple applications through proper channel but tycoons & carpowrates running the medical institutes get all such licences & permits in a jiffy. It's not a mystery who grants these . But blame the Drs!  


Then a patient avoids Govt hospital for lack of facilities and goes to 7 🌟 medicities and then cribs he has been billed in lakhs! What did he expect? Sheraton at the rate of nukkad kee kachori with dharmshala?? Ok, don't come to Govt hospital for all perceived reasons because line long, OPD not everyday, cannot meet favourite Dr.. so go to the neighbourhood friendly Dr to obviate all the above-mentioned troubles and after getting all the requirements met instantly crib about being charged ₹200 extra. Price of life is ₹200 or ₹2000000? It's way more, priceless! Yet, people who waste money on every harmful/useless  thing from samose chaat to pizza burger to cigarettes to alcohol to movies to toxic make up to  weekend parties to running  vehicles and shower repeatedly worthless people with all their monies for these poisons to destroy their health  yet cry hoarse for petty ₹ when their lives are saved by Drs. Life of a human being cannot be weighed even in crores of Rupees. 

For those unsatisfied with Pvt/carpowrate hospitals are welcome in Govt hospitals where the best talents in medicine work against all odds and there's no concern of paying any fee, forget cribbing about ₹200 or ₹2000000 for a precious life saved. 

 माननीय सर्वोच्च न्यायालय के आदेशानुसार किसी भी रोग की जाँच के लिये सभी आवश्यक प्रमाण होने ही चाहिये अन्यथा चिकित्सा को दोषपूर्ण अथवा आपराधिक माना जायेगा और चिकित्सक तथा चिकित्सालय को भारी दण्ड(हत्या की धाराओं के अंतर्गत) दिया जायेगा जिसमें करोड़ों रुपयों की क्षतिपूर्ति से लेकर सश्रम आजीवन कारावास तक दिया जाता है। ऐसे तुच्छ बतगोले साझा करने से पहले कुछ जानकारी भी प्राप्त करें। चिकित्सक की नैदानिक क्षमता अथवा अनुभव और ज्ञान को माननीय न्यायालय में प्रमाण नहीं माना जाता। प्रमाण होता है जाँचें। डॉ के समर्पण/भावना/परिश्रम/कौशल को चिकित्सा नहीं माना जाता है माननीय न्यायालय में क्योंकि वह व्यक्तिपरक है वस्तुनिष्ठ एवं सुसंगत नहीं है, अपितु सुविधाओं और विभिन्न कलपुर्जे/अवयवों के प्रयोग को ही चिकित्सा बताया गया है वैधानिक रूप से। 
The controversial Dr Kunal Saha case 👇
This particular disease happens one in millions, the three Drs who treated were the best and most experienced and did their best to treat the lady, unfortunately she succumbed to the condition in spite of the very best treatment given in the country. Her USA based husband, a Dr himself, registered police case in Kolkata, the three Drs served jail, their medical licences were cancelled, after years of litigation the honourable supreme court decided that the treating Drs were at fault because of 'wrong diagnosis' and must pay astronomical ₹5 Crs+ with interest as compensation to the 'victim'. 

हम सभी कहते ही हैं कि जीवन अमूल्य है, करोड़ों अरबों-खरबों रुपए से भी कहीं अधिक। माननीय सर्वोच्च न्यायालय ने भी करोड़ों में ही बताया। 
अब पैसे नहीं लगने देने हैं प्राणरक्षा के लिये तो सरकारी चिकित्सालयों में आइये। सरकारें, न्यायालय, प्रशासन ही तो वैधानिक रूप से निजी/कारपोरेट चिकित्सालयों को चलवा रहे हैं तो‌ वहाँ प्राणरक्षा हेतु २००, २०००, २००००, २०००००० ₹ लगाना तो हमारी पुरातन मान्यताओं अथवा  माननीय सर्वोच्च न्यायालय के मानदण्डों का दशमांश भी नहीं है।🙏 

यह जो सीजीएचएस, ईसीएचएस आदि सरकारी व्यवस्थाये हैं वह‌ तो स्वयं ही सरकारी कर्मचारियों, सैनिकों, अधिकारियों, न्यायधीशों, नेताओं, पत्रकारों के निजी/कारपोरेट चिकित्सालयों में अद्यतन प्रचलित खर्चे पर चिकित्सा कराने पर ही चल रहे हैं। तो जो यह व्यवस्था सुनिश्चित कर रहे हैं कि सात सितारा निजी चिकित्सालय हों उन्हें दोष न देकर भुक्तभोगी चिकित्सकों को दोष देना तो नितांत खोखलापन है। 

एक चिकित्सालय चलाने के प्रत्यक्ष तथा अप्रत्यक्ष व्यय, बिजली पानी, संसाधन तथा कर्मचारियों के वेतन भत्ते आदि की चर्चा तो तो पता चले कि वह आकाश से नहीं बरसते। तनिक भी संदेह मन में ना रखें, सरकारी सार्वजनिक चिकित्सालयों में ही आयें, आपका सदैव स्वागत है। और अपने लाखों करोड़ों रुपये निजी/कारपोरेट को व्यर्थ सौंपकर नष्ट होने देने तथा निजी / कारपोरेट को धनवान होने से बचायें। 

Whether private/corporate hospitals should be there at all? 👇 

No one condones negligence, every Dr is intolerant to it. Split second decisions in extraordinary circumstances by daring Drs are retrospectively scrutinised by non medico legal system for years and decades आराम से only to declare the Drs guilty for negligence. While judgement in murder, mass murder or child gangrape cases in‌ honourable courts takes not split second but decades and generations and mostly the accused roam free ultimately like Manu Sharma, Shushil Kr, Afroz. Cruel paradox that a filmy fellow's footpath run over case judgement has been reversed by the honourable HC then re-reversed by the most honourable SC ie total three verdicts in same case in three different courts in decades but split second decisions by Drs are negligence. So Drs are villains. 
Of course the cost of healthcare will rise if Drs have to be ready for indemnity in crores in any random case as the law of vicarious liability too has been discontinued with.
see 

The unfortunate patient suffered Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis which has 50% case fatality rate. The court case in Kolkata ran for 14 years during which one of the four "accused" Drs died. 
Now the compensation in this Kolkata case claimed was 77 Crores primarily and further 20 Crs were claimed ie total 97 crores. The plea said that the compensation should be calculated on the day of judgement as the amount of money the victim would have earned in USA plus the interest plus the compensatory amount. 
BTW Indian court 7 years ago awarded ₹ 11.41 Crs as the compensation taking into account the victims income in dollars plus interest. 

So in the current scenario Drs must ask for fees as the system decides because daktari is humanitarian selfless service but when punishment is to be given in a grave case where every other patient is known to succumb to the disease still punishment is to be given: the Drs must be jailed too and the compensation should be per the earning capacity of the patient, preferably in $,€,£ at current rates. 

Medicine is the most investment intensive and the least profitable business. Unfortunately it's considered business only by the system. Every licencing, charge, rate, levy, tax, cess is at or above market rate. Upon that medico-legal liabilities are abound and minimum at crores per case. You must be aware that echs, cghs, pmjay compensation to hospital are mostly half or lesser than even the costs incurred by the hospital/doctor per case. That's why I recommend better to use Govt hospital, if one can pull strings even better. 

Altruism and charity were good only till MBBS was the final degree, every doctor had job/earning surplus, there was no consumer act, medico-legal liabilities were not applied: ie till late 80s.. scenario didn't change overnight though.. but those who've joined MBBS in 80s are subjected to later MD SR DM MCh phalana dhimkana making studentship/trainee period over 15 years ie no income and still no job/earning surety plus every other case being a consumer act medico-legal liability. So doctors MUST NOT do charity.

 See here 👉

मंगलवार, 9 जून 2020

Private, Corporate Hospitals reflect the failure, not success of our welfare State.

 
There's this alleged picture doing rounds on social media where supposedly a non Govt Hospital has enumerated charges for ICU and various categories of beds for treatment of patients. 

If the system made healthcare a revenue generating  business and allowed Pvt sector to enter as players and even be listed at stock exchange as profit making companies it's all  an unavoidable consequence. 

System is not interfering because it's made all legal and justified. 
It's the duty of govt to make education and health freely available everywhere to everyone, not profit making companies. If the system finds it wrong it should take over the private/corporate hospitals. CGHS, ECHS, Ayushman all are utilised in Pvt/Corpt hospitals. 

If the system saw Pvt/Corpt hospitals as wrong it'd shut them down and not give them empanelment under aforesaid schemes. 
Healthcare & education are  the most stringently governed stream. Still the loopholes are there because politicians own big  hospitals and medical institutes. Coming to IRDA,  insurance companies are allowed to own/run hospitals (Max for eg), pharma companies are allowed to own/run hospitals (Fortis for eg), lawmakers own/run hospitals.. so there's clear conflict of interest everywhere allowed legally. 

कोई यह नहीं पूछता कि देश में इतनी निर्धनता क्यों है? सभी धनवान नहीं हो सकते किन्तु धनवान और निर्धन तो अपवाद होने चाहिये, यहाँ तो दीन हीन ही बाहुल्य में हैं। डॉ का कार्य दीनता उन्मूलन नहीं है, सरकारें हैं जो बाबू और नेता चलाते हैं, उन पर दृष्टि रखना न्यायलयों का कार्य है। डॉ के सिर पर देश की निर्धनता का ठीकरा फोड़ दो, क्या आनंद है?!जनसांख्यिकी के मूलभूत सिद्धांत अनुसार धनवान और निर्धन की संख्या आदर्श रूप से ४ मानक विचलन के बाहर होनी चाहिये, कम से कम ३ मानक विचलन के बाहर, यहाँ तो निर्धन जन ही २ मानक विचलन के भीतर हैं! 

मध्यम वर्ग का तो यह है कि इतने प्रकार के करदान के बाद भी यदि घर में कोई गंभीर अस्वस्थ हो जाये तो सरकारी/धर्मार्थ चिकित्सालयों में निशुल्क अथवा नगण्य व्यय पर भी चिकित्सा कराने में भागदौड़ आदि में ही लाखों खर्च हो कर सड़क पर आने की स्थिति हो जाती है। हमारे शासक सुनिश्चित करें कि ऐसा ना हो। प्रथम बार किसी शासक ने ऐसा किया है आयुष्मान योजना के अंतर्गत यद्यपि यह योजना ऐसा मानकर चलती है कि निजी डॉक्टरों के पास कोई गुप्त अकूत संपत्ति है जिससे वह इसको वहन कर लेंगे। सार्वजनिक चिकित्सालयों की संख्या में बढ़ोतरी तो है नहीं क्योंकि राजस्व वसूली वहाँ से होती नहीं बस व्यय होता है। 

शिक्षा चिकित्सा सभी का निजीकरण लंबे समय से हो रखा है, जो गुणवत्ता वाले शिक्षा संस्थान, चिकित्सालय चला रहे हैं उन निजी संस्थानों, चिकित्सालयों पर राइट टू एजुकेशन ऐक्ट, क्लिनिकल एस्टैब्लिशमेण्ट ऐक्ट आदि नाना दण्डात्मक विधान लगा कर देश की निर्धनता दूर कराई जा रही है, सामाजिक कल्याण किया जा रहा है जबकि सार्वजनिक विद्यालय चिकित्सालय ना तो संख्या में बढ़ाये जा रहे हैं ना गुणवत्ता/सुविधा में क्योंकि राजस्व नहीं होता, व्यय होता है। ऐसा कैसे चलेगा कि सार्वजनिक संस्थानों के पतन के नाम पर निजी संस्थानों को खोलने दिया जाये जिनमें नेताओं बाबुओं के बच्चे परिवार लाभान्वित हों।

Whether Drs should earn? 👇 

सोमवार, 18 मई 2020

Discrimination in education in the name of minorities in India

Someone sent me this meme where West is fighting pandemic while our schools are asking for fees👉 USA or Italy haven't suspended taking fees. BTW just because of Pandemic can we willingly forego our salaries or income? School issue is not so simple. Law: 93rd amendment, article 15(5), article 30, and RTE Act have seggregated schools into "minority" and non minority. Jains, Sikhs and Buddhists are under minority with muslims and christians under the laws for education. Non minority schools are completely non aided ie NO Govt support/subsidies/funding of any kind. But under RTE they've to fill 25% seats to various disadvantaged groups from whom they cannot take fees by law and no such seat should remain vacant, their fees is paid from the fees of regular students but most states have put limits on raising the fees for years. The fees from students provides for the salaries of staff. But non minority schools must recruit teachers per Govt rules and pay salaries accordingly. 

  Minority schools do NOT have any such rules, also, they've a huge chunk of schools which are given Govt assistance, funding, subsidies under the "aided" category, including the salaries of staff; also they've full freedom in recruiting teachers where exemptions in TET and other qualifications are upheld as legal by courts. Also, under minority category they get many rebates exemptions which non-minority do not get. 

I don't know how many of us here know how education and educational institutions are legally subjected to religious discrimination. Also, all minority schools, colleges, universities can teach their respective religion in their institutions as they're privileged by law while the non-minority institutions cannot teach their religion to students as they're subjected to  law. 

So before you ask schools to not ask for fees ask their status under article 30 भाई। A category of schools do not have money for their staff to pay remember, and another set is flush with money. 
So who's asking fees matters. 
Think, understand, act accordingly. 

शुक्रवार, 15 मई 2020

सनातन भारतीय भोजन और व्यञ्जनों के विदेशी/विधर्मी मूल का मिथ्या भ्रामक दुष्प्रचार

अभी कहीं मिथ्या लेख देखा कि बाटी को भाप देकर बाफला बनाने की विधा मुगलों ने सिखायी। 
भाई मुगल मध्य एशिया से आये थे, अफगानिस्तान होते हुए। दोनों ही स्थानों पर कोई भी भाप किया हुआ पारंपरिक व्यंजन आज भी  नहीं है। वहाँ ऐसी वस्तुएं अधिकांश तंदूर में बनाई जाती हैं। मध्य एवं पश्चिम राजस्थान जल सघन राज्य तो है नहीं इसीलिये पारंपरिक रूप से बाफला मालवा में और आंशिक रूप से लगे हुए हाड़ौती/मेवाड़ में बनाया जाता है। भाप किये भोजन पूर्वांचल (पूर्व उप्र, बिहार), बंगाल ओडिशा असम एवं दक्षिण भारत में सहस्राब्दियों से बनाये जाते हैं। मालवा सम्राट विक्रमादित्य के समय से ही लघु भारत था जहाँ सभी क्षेत्रों के लोग आवागमन/निवास करते थे, वहीं यह बाफला आरंभ हुआ था। 

मुगलों और बाफला से ध्यान आया कि केरल में आजकल प्रोपेगैंडा है कि इडली डोसा वहाँ अरब लाये थे, अरे इतिहास से आज तक अरब में धान की खेती नहीं हुई, उड़द दाल उगती नहीं और पानी नहीं अरब में किन्तु इडली डोसा का श्रेय अरबों को! 
ऐसे ही बकवास है कि बिरयानी/पुलाव मुगल लाये थे। अरे भैया मध्य एशिया में घोड़ों पर रहने वाले घुमंतू जहाँ आज भी चावल नहीं उगता, मसाले तो भारत और द•पू• एशिया के बाहर कहीं कभी हुए नहीं तो वे मुगल हमारी प्राचीन सभ्यता संस्कृति को जो चावल और मसाले की जन्मभूमि हैं, हमें चावल बनाना सिखायेंगे, अति है झूठ बोलने की! ईरान/फारस में जहाँ से संस्कृति सीखते थे मुगल कहाँ आज भी बिरयानी में चावल ही नहीं पड़ता, वह मैदे की रोटी और माँस से बनती है। 

और निर्लज्ज झूठ कि पनीर अंगरेजों ने सिखाया! पृथ्वी पर जहाँ सबसे पहिले गौमाता ने मनुष्य को दूध दिया, वहाँ हम दही, खोआ, छेना बना खा रहे हैं किन्तु पनीर अलग से हमें असभ्य लोग बनाना सिखायेंगे जहाँ मात्र ५०० वर्ष पहले वे अंधकार युग में स्वयं जी रहे थे! 

पुलाक मूल व्यंजन है चावल का जो ऋग्वेद, चरक और याज्ञवल्क्य संहिता में बताया गया है, जिसे विदेशी पुलाव कहने लगे। पुलाव, इडली, बाफला आदि सभी भारतीय व्यञ्जनों की विधा पाकशास्त्र की प्राचीन पुस्तकों रसमञ्जरी, मानसोल्लास आदि में भी विस्तार से मिलता है। फारस/ईरान में पोलो ही कहते हैं आज भी जो पुलाक से निकला है। बिरयानी का मूल अर्थ फारसी में है भुना मांस जो ईरान में रोटले के साथ बनता है। 

मध्य एशिया के तुर्का मुगल जिनकी राजभाषा तथा उधार की किंतु फारसी थी वे पुलाव में भुना माँस मिलाने लगे तो बिरयानी कहने लगे। आइने अकबरी में भी लिखा है कि सल्तनतों के पहले भी भारत में पुलाव बिरयानी खाये जाते थे जिनके भारतीय नाम.थे। और असत्य कथन चल पड़ा कि पुलाव और बिरयानी मुगल लाये थे। 

अब देखिये कि मूढ़ फिरंगी आज भी पूड़ी, रोटी, कचौड़ी सभी को इण्डियन ब्रेड ही कहते हैं तो चूंकि ब्रेड विदेशी शब्द है तो पूड़ी कचौडी आदि क्या अंग्रेजों ने हमको सिखाया?? ठीक वैसे ही हास्यास्पद है भारतीय भोजन की खोज का श्रेय मुगलों को देना। 

आप सभी को तो बचपन का वह.मूर्ख पाठ स्मरणहोगा कि भारत की खोज किसने की- 'वास्कोडिगामा ने'। अरे मंदबुद्धियों को यह.नहीं पता कि भारतवर्ष ७००० वर्षों पुरानी सभ्यता है जिसको लूटने के उद्देश्य से अलक्षेन्द्र अयोनिया , यूरोप, से २३०० वर्ष पहले ही आ चुका था, फिर रोमन साम्राज्य से भारत के सदियों तक.समुद्र मार्ग से व्यापार व राजनयिक संबंध थे जिनके असंख्य पुरातात्विक प्रमाण हैं तो गधे वास्को ने कैसे भारत.अथवा भारत के समुद्री मार्ग की खोज की?! 

भारतवर्ष और सनातन धर्म सभ्यता संस्कृति को नीचा दिखाने की हर कुत्सित निकृष्ट घृणित कुकृत्य का खण्डन करें और ऐसे दुर्भावनापूर्ण, दुराग्रह ग्रसित दुष्प्रचार से बचें। 

समय देने हेतु आभार, 
सविनय धन्यवाद 🙏😊

शनिवार, 9 मई 2020

The CRPF role in national security

J&K police DGP said that CRPF is of no use in J&K and only RR and State police does everything  see here 

These fellows have luck to become DGPs of central security forces without belonging to any of their cadre and then blabber a lot, if they were really good and not subservient to politics for decades the crimes in States would've vanished long back. They've a penchant for fomenting discord to their own advantage. Because of them the Central Forces cadre reach only upto IGP  while these fellows only become DGPs despite not having even served in a Central Force. They even become the chief of NSG, SPG which are multi agencies deputational forces where the former ie NSG has military units under them. These all things feed their vacuous egos.  

You'd see military officers, central forces officers fight and sacrifice in CI Ops, but not one from these fellows police services, even in the States where they're allotted their respective cadres. All glory, don't ask about guts or grime. 
See those two recent examples where CRPF jawans and officers were awarded the maximum gallantry awards in the year. CRPF gets more gallantry awards than any other central force, they've even got Shaurya and Kirti Chakra which are primarily designated only for the military. see here
See that one officer who eliminated 50 terrorists in J&K. see here 
These babu cadre fellows are plain jealous. 

Also, during the December 2001 parliament attack the CRPF jawans defended the country apex org without any special weaponry or gadgetry with minimum casualty to CRPF personnel. Constable D Santosh Kumar single handedly neutralised the terrorist jihadis. He got Shaurya Chakra. There was no need to call NSG or military. The fidayeen were killed before that. That's the greatness of CRPF. 🙏 People should not forget that the National Police Commemoration Day on 21 October is observed in the honour of the valiant troopers of the CRPF who fought off the Chinese military attack at our Aksaichin in 1959. In Sept 1965 the single company deployed at Kutch's Sardar post repelled and defeated a full brigade attack by Pakistan. There were no ITBP,SSB in 1959 and no BSF in 1965 War. 
Glory be to the CRPF!!🙏🙏 
👆 CRPF has also been awarded Ashoka Chakra. 

These blabbering uniformed babus are so unique that the CP of Kolkata see here was acting as the conduit for a political party and now is on the run see here after blocking CBI itself, another central Police agency . 
Dilbagh Singh's utterances, ignorant or otherwise, are an ignominious insult to the veergati of thousands of CRPF jawans who sacrificed themselves for the motherland. 
CRPF doesn't get the popularity in public imagination because by design it's not meant to be glamorous. They're doing yeoman's service to the nation silently with their motto सेवा भक्ति/निष्ठा Service Loyalty. 

बुधवार, 15 अप्रैल 2020

इन्द्र पूजा

Poor understanding of our legends amounting to blasphemy (though technically the word has no exact parallels in Hindu texts) denigrate Bhagavan Indra. Anyways Indra Bhagavan  equated with Zeus doesn't mean we slander our dEvarAja. It's dEvanindA. Now some would cite popular/obscure references from our itihAsa purANa that Indra did this, did that.. well, that's been explained by Puri Shankaracharya very well. Hindus, especially us, should desist from casting aspersions on dEvas. Even some alleged incidents in some texts have a context or reason behind them. 

इन्द्र भगवान् is the most mentioned dEva in V Ramayana. Whenever Bhagavan Shri Rama is mentioned he's described in reference to Indra, far more than Bhagavan Vishnuji. From beginning to end in the Epic. 
If Indra had not tested अहल्या Shri Rama wouldn't have got to make her alive back from stone and she wouldn't have been recognised as a पञच Kanya. 

AFAIU/S Shruti are above itihAsa purANa so I'd always go with the depiction of Indra in the former than the latter. 
Many would not like it but if anyone goes through पौराणिक texts, especially vaiShnava ones, they all equate Indra with their respective deities who happen to be described in image of Indra himself, in some texts at significant points Indra is even made seen as replaceable. There onwards the worship of Bhagavan Indra is seen in decline. 
शैव texts do that with Prajapati/BrahmA. 

Without making light of one deity another cannot be made prominent who is evidently mentioned as either the image of the former or described as taking over the function of the former. 

मंगलवार, 7 अप्रैल 2020

सती प्रथा

सती प्रथा नहीं होती थी ऐसा नहीं है किन्तु अपवादस्वरूप ही होती थी वैदिक काल में। यह हमारे पश्चिमोत्तर सीमान्त क्षत्रियों में यदा-कदा देखी गयी थी। अन्य वर्णों तथा अन्य क्षत्रियों में प्रचलन नहीं था। अतः माद्री ने सती किया किन्तु कुन्ती ने नहीं। सती शब्द तो देवी माता सती से ही आया है जो अपने पिता प्रजापति दक्ष जी के हवन कुण्ड में अग्नि में लीन हो गयीं थीं अपने पति के सम्मान हेतु। सल्तनत आक्रांताओं के समय में जब जीतने की संभावना नहीं रहती थी तो पुरुष साका करते थे और चूंकि वे लौट कर नहीं आयेंगे तो महिलाएं जौहर करतीं थीं। वह सती प्रथा नहीं था। जो कि तब भी अपवाद ही था‌। एक आध सती जो राजपूताना में देखे गये वह इतने अप्रत्याशित थे कि लोगों ने वहाँ विस्मय और श्रद्धा से मंदिर बनवा दिया। सती प्रथा का बढ़ा चढ़ा कर आरोप अंग्रेजों ने बंगाल में लगाया, वहाँ शेष भारत से कुछ अधिक थी सती प्रथा किन्तु स्वैच्छिक नगण्य थी। वहाँ आज से ८०० वर्ष पूर्व दायभाग नियम परिवार संचालन में जिमूतिवाहन ने आरंभ किया जिसमें शेष भारत में प्रयुक्त मिताक्षरा की तुलना में विधवाओं को पति की संपत्ति में अधिकार अधिक सुनिश्चित किये गये। तो वहाँ कतिपय ईर्ष्यालु परिवारों में लोभ तथा दुर्भावनावश नयी विधवाओं को बलात् सती किया गया जिसका विदेशी लोगों ने बढ़ा चढ़ाकर दुष्प्रचार किया। १८३९ में पंजाब महाराज रणजीत सिंह की पत्नियों ने भी स्त्री किया था, वह भी सैकड़ों वर्षों में राजपरिवार में अपवाद था। 
अब रही शास्त्रों की बात तो किसी भी स्मृति अथवा सूत्र में कहीं भी सती की अनुशंसा नहीं है।